Reminds me of the fake "grievance study" research done by James Lindsay et al, and then peer reviewed and published by leading academic journals. As they described, you just blabber off dense strings of their favored buzz words and phrases. Nobody can make any sense of it, or cares, so it gets passed through the system uncritically and no one pays any price for the sloppiness.
He didn't write the actual statement. It was a satirical piece because the first draft was so Kendiesque that he could have easily done it, but we're just a state school, we don't have enough to pay him.
I picked 2 as human because the abstract “community” is really important to these authoritarians. If they have their “community” they can put you in the blasphemous out group.
Lol. I picked #1 as human.
Reminds me of the fake "grievance study" research done by James Lindsay et al, and then peer reviewed and published by leading academic journals. As they described, you just blabber off dense strings of their favored buzz words and phrases. Nobody can make any sense of it, or cares, so it gets passed through the system uncritically and no one pays any price for the sloppiness.
💯
I picked 2 because it was dumber than 1.
That this turned out to be correct tells me that the entire administration could be replaced by ChatAI.
Did Kendi (Rogers) have a hand in writing the actual statement. Can we replace him also?
He didn't write the actual statement. It was a satirical piece because the first draft was so Kendiesque that he could have easily done it, but we're just a state school, we don't have enough to pay him.
I picked 2 as human because the abstract “community” is really important to these authoritarians. If they have their “community” they can put you in the blasphemous out group.